🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion state that a lack of decision on how best to address the issue is causing them unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their loved ones.

An Impending Threat to Historic Graveyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being consumed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation details a series of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer sites. Officials say it is for local people to determine how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They wanted this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident remembered a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. That is not the case. People will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while serving abroad. His parent expressed she could not sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to consider this won’t be his lasting home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important place to go.”

In her view, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to disturb current plots. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

An absence of agreement over when and how to tackle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some are calling for additional coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to continue for now. Different voices contend the moment for relocation is drawing near.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And all parties is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A local official said the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with communities.”

It was also stated there was time to consider all the options. “We are talking decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires good local conversations to discover the right solutions for each community.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was described as one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, offering a spiritual perspective on the physical loss of hallowed earth.